INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN THE USE OF WEATHER INDEX INSURANCE IN AGRICULTURE UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of global ecological problems arising under conditions of climate change and of the world experience in the use of weather insurance and its importance in reducing their adverse impact on agriculture. The article provides analytical considerations and conclusions on the advantages and shortcomings of the introduction of weather insurance in European countries, and on the weather insurance products and insurance providers for each country. Based on the experience of European states, the article examines index insurance, state subsidies, digital technologies and institutional reforms in the insurance market, and develops practical recommendations for Uzbekistan.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Janic Bucheli, Nina Conrad, Stefan Wimmer, Tobias Dalhaus, Robert Finger. Weather insurance in European crop and horticulture production. Received 25 August 2022; Received in revised form 12 May 2023; Accepted 19 May 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2023.100525.
Calum G. Turvey. Weather Derivatives for Specific Event Risks in Agriculture. First published: 01 October 2001 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9353.00065
Barnett, B.J., Mahul, O., 2007. Weather index insurance for agriculture and rural areas in lower- income countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89 (5), 1241–1247. First published: 01 December 2007 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01091
Bucheli, J., Dalhaus, T., Finger, R., 2022. Temperature effects on crop yields in heat index insurance. Food Policy 107, 102214.
Clarke, D.J., 2016. A theory of rational demand for index insurance. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 8 (1), 283–306.
Skees, J.R., Black, J.R., Barnett, B.J., 1997. Designing and rating an area yield crop insurance contract. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 (2), 430–438.