Pedagogik-psixologik fanlar mazmuni asosida bo‘lajak o‘qituvchilarning kognitiv kompetensiyalarini rivojlantirish metodikasi
Methodology for developing the cognitive competencies of future teachers based on the content of pedagogical and psychological disciplines
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article highlights the methodology for developing the cognitive competencies of future teachers based on integrating the content of pedagogical and psychological sciences. The relevance of the research is determined by the need to prepare a specialist capable of analyzing knowledge, applying it to a pedagogical situation, arguing, solving problems, and reflectively evaluating their activities rather than memorizing it in higher pedagogical education. The study combined systemic, competency-based, activity-oriented, and psychological-pedagogical approaches; methods of theoretical analysis, pedagogical observation, diagnostic tasks, questionnaires, expert assessment, and comparison of experimental results were used. The empirical base included diagnostic and methodological work with 384 students studying at the faculties of foreign languages of Karakalpak State University named after Berdakh, the National Pedagogical University of Uzbekistan named after Nizami and Urgench State University. The results showed that when the content of pedagogical and psychological disciplines is linked to problem situations, cases, reflexive tasks, and digital sources, the content, operational, motivational-reflexive, and communicative components of cognitive competence develop together. The article proposes a step-by-step methodological model for developing these competencies and indicators for its evaluation.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
OECD. “OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: OECD Learning Compass 2030. A Series of Concept Notes”. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019. 31 p. URL: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/projects/edu/education-2040/1-1-learning-compass/OECD Learning Compass 2030 Concept Note Series.pdf (murojaat sanasi: 05.10.2026).
Molnár, G., Kocsis, Á. Cognitive and non-cognitive predictors of academic success in higher education: a large-scale longitudinal study. “Studies in Higher Education”. 2024. Vol. 49, No. 9. P. 1610–1624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2271513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2271513
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., Punie, Y. “DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes”. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2022. 125 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2760/115376.
Akhmetova, A., Karmanova, Z., Demissenova, S., Sadvakassova, N., Koshkumbaev, K. Pedagogical Technologies and Cognitive Development in Secondary Education. “Open Education Studies”. 2024. Vol. 6, No. 1. Article 20220214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2022-0214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2022-0214
UNESCO. “UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. Version 3”. Paris: UNESCO, 2018. 64 p. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721 (murojaat sanasi: 05.10.2026).
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., Osher, D. Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. “Applied Developmental Science”. 2020. Vol. 24, No. 2. P. 97–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Panadero, E. A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. “Frontiers in Psychology”. 2017. Vol. 8. Article 422. 28 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Coyle, D., Hood, P., Marsh, D. “CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 173 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107280642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024549