The role of transformations and their effectiveness in achieving phraseological equivalence in translation between English and Uzbek

Main Article Content

Kurbiyazova Umida Abdulla qizi
Kubeysinova Dametken Tursunbaevna

Abstract

Phraseological equivalence is a complex problem of translation because fixed expressions combine denotative meaning with conventional imagery, pragmatic force, cultural associations, and stylistic value. This article investigates the role of lexical, grammatical, semantic, and stylistic transformations in English-Uzbek phraseological translation and evaluates the effectiveness of combined translation procedures. The research is based on comparative, contextual, semantic, and functional analysis of selected English phraseological units and proverbs together with their Uzbek correspondences. The findings show that formal similarity is not a sufficient criterion of adequacy. Effective phraseological translation depends on preservation of contextual meaning, conformity with Uzbek grammatical and phraseological norms, pragmatic correspondence, and stylistic appropriateness. Lexical and semantic transformations are especially productive where the two languages conventionalize comparable meanings through different lexical components or figurative images, whereas grammatical transformations are required by structural differences between English and Uzbek. Combined procedures become necessary when several types of asymmetry occur simultaneously. The study concludes that transformation is not a departure from equivalence but a systematic means of achieving it when direct correspondence is linguistically or culturally inadequate.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kurbiyazova Umida Abdulla qizi, & Kubeysinova Dametken Tursunbaevna. (2026). The role of transformations and their effectiveness in achieving phraseological equivalence in translation between English and Uzbek. Partner Conferences of the International Scientific Journal Research Focus, 882-887. https://doi.org/10.66073/ReFocus-Conf/0910177

References

Baker, M. (2018). In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. 3rd ed. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619187

Vinay, J.-P., & Darbelnet, J. (1995). Comparative Stylistics of French and English: A Methodology for Translation. Trans. J. C. Sager & M.-J. Hamel. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.11

Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. New York: Prentice Hall.

Nida, E. A., & Taber, C. R. (1969). The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

Catford, J. C. (1965). A Linguistic Theory of Translation: An Essay in Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press.

House, J. (2015). Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315752839

Munday, J., Ramos Pinto, S., & Blakesley, J. (2022). Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. 5th ed. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429352461