MODERN AND INTERACTIVE TOOLS FOR TEACHING NEUROLOGY IN MEDICAL EDUCATION

Article Sidebar

PDF (Uzbek)
Published: 2025-12-05
DOI: https://doi.org/10.66073/ReFocus-Conf/301
Keywords:
neurology, medical education, interactive learning, virtual reality, simulation, clinical skills, problem-based learning, telemedicine, multimedia, digital platforms, neurophysiology, pedagogical innovation, student-centered learning, clinical reasoning, diagnostic technologies

Main Article Content

Abdullayev Umidjon Shukurullo oglu
Namangan State Pedagogical Institute independent researcher

Abstract

Neurology is an important component of modern medical education and is of great importance in the diagnosis and treatment of complex nervous system diseases. This article analyzes modern and interactive tools for teaching neurology in medical education and their impact on the educational process. The study extensively covers skills in working with virtual and simulation technologies, interactive multimedia tools, problem-based learning methods, telemedicine platforms, and modern diagnostic methods. Analysis of scientific sources shows that modern interactive tools increase students' clinical competence by 30-45%, accelerate the mastery of neurological examination techniques, and improve the retention of knowledge in long-term memory. The article reveals in more detail the advantages, application features, and future prospects of innovative approaches in neurology education. The conclusion emphasizes the need and importance of introducing modern technologies into the medical education system of Uzbekistan.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Republican scientific-practical conference on “New Paradigms in Science, Technology and Education”

Section

Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Abdullayev Umidjon Shukurullo oglu. (2025). MODERN AND INTERACTIVE TOOLS FOR TEACHING NEUROLOGY IN MEDICAL EDUCATION. Partner Conferences of the International Scientific Journal Research Focus, 1(1), 180-184. https://doi.org/10.66073/ReFocus-Conf/301

References

Kolb D.A. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education; 2015. 416 p.

2. Harden R.M., Laidlaw J.M. Essential skills for a medical teacher: An introduction to teaching and learning in medicine. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2017. 312 p.

3. Cook D.A., Hatala R., Brydges R. et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis // JAMA. 2011. Vol. 306(9). P. 978-988.

4. Makary M., Holzmueller C., Thompson D. et al. Operating room briefings: working on the same page // Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 2006. Vol. 32(6). P. 351-355.

5. McGaghie W.C., Issenberg S.B., Petrusa E.R., Scalese R.J. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009 // Medical Education. 2010. Vol. 44(1). P. 50-63.

6. Ellaway R.H., Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment // Medical Teacher. 2008. Vol. 30(5). P. 455-473.

7. Ruiz J.G., Mintzer M.J., Leipzig R.M. The impact of e-learning in medical education // Academic Medicine. 2006. Vol. 81(3). P. 207-212.

8. Wijnen-Meijer M., ten Cate O., van der Schaaf M., Harendza S. Graduates from vertically integrated curricula // Clinical Teacher. 2013. Vol. 10(3). P. 155-159.

9. Barrows H.S., Tamblyn R.M. Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 1980. 206 p.

10.Schmidt H.G., Rotgans J.I., Yew E.H. The process of problem-based learning: what works and why // Medical Education. 2011. Vol. 45(8). P. 792-806.

11.Thistlethwaite J.E., Davies D., Ekeocha S. et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23 // Medical Teacher. 2012. Vol. 34(6). P. e421-e444.

12.Wosinski J., Belcher A.E., Dürrenberger Y. et al. Facilitating problem-based learning among undergraduate nursing students: A qualitative systematic review // Nurse Education Today. 2018. Vol. 60.

13.Consorti F., Mancuso R., Nocioni M., Piccolo A. Efficacy of virtual patients in medical education: A meta-analysis of randomized studies // Computers & Education. 2012. Vol. 59(3). P. 1001-1008.

14.Guze P.A. Using technology to meet the challenges of medical education // Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association. 2015. Vol. 126. P. 260-270.

15.Nicholson L.L., Reed D., Chan C. An interactive, multi-modal Anatomy workshop improves academic performance in the health sciences: a cohort study // BMC Medical Education. 2016. Vol. 16. P. 7.

16.O‘rmonjonov Azizbek Muhammadjon o‘g‘li. (2025). MAKTABGACHA TA’LIM YOSHIDAGI IMKONIYATI CHEKLANGAN BOLALAR UCHUN INKLYUZIV TA’LIM SHAROITIDA MUSIQIY TA’LIMNI TASHKIL ETISH METODIKASI. Kelajak o’qituvchisi - Kelajak Bunyodkori, 1(1), 470-475.

17.Ramziddin Tursunov. (2025). IJTIMOIY ONG VA MA’NAVIYAT TUSHUNCHASI HAMDA UNING MAZMUN-MOHIYATI. Kelajak o’qituvchisi - Kelajak Bunyodkori, 1(2), 36-40.