Биологическая детоксикация микотоксинов в кормах с использованием молочнокислых бактерий
Biological detoxification of mycotoxins in feed using lactic acid bacteria
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The antifungal activity of lactic acid bacteria against the mycotoxigenic fungus Aspergillus flavus, isolated from local feed samples, was investigated. The strains Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Enterococcus faecium, and Weissella cibaria demonstrated strong antifungal activity, producing growth inhibition zones of 43–47 mm. No viable fungal cells were detected after 30 days of co-cultivation. These findings indicate the potential of the investigated bacteria for developing biological approaches to protect feed against mycotoxigenic fungi.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
S. Ndiaye, M. Zhang, M. Fall, N. M. Ayessou, Q. Zhang, P. Li. Current Review of Mycotoxin Biodegradation and Bioadsorption: Microorganisms, Mechanisms, and Main Important Applications // Toxins (Basel). -2022. -p. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14110729 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins14110729
H. Ossa D.E., Hincapié D.A., Peñuela G.A. Determination of aflatoxin M1 in ice cream samples using immunoaffinity columns and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry // Food Control. - 2015. -№.56. -P. 34–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.03.011
Majer-Baranyi K., Zalán Z., Mörtl M., Juracsek J., Szendrő I., Székács A., Adányi N. Optical waveguide lightmode spectroscopy technique-based immunosensor development for aflatoxin B1 determination in spice paprika samples //Food Chem. -2016. -211.-p.972–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.089
Mwakinyali S.E., Ding X., Ming Z., Tong W., Zhang Q., Li P. Recent development of aflatoxin contamination biocontrol in agricultural products // Biol. Control.- 2019. -№. 128. -p. 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.09.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.09.012