Alyuminiy oksidli keramik qoplamalarning Escherichia coli bakteriyalarini sorbsiyalash xususiyatini tadqiq etish

Study of the ability of aluminium oxide ceramic coatings to sorb Escherichia coli bacteria

Main Article Content

Mamarayimova Marjona Abdusodik kizi
Akhmedova Zahro Rakhmatovna
Abdullayeva Yulduz Alisher kizi

Abstract

This article analyzes the sorption efficiency of aluminium oxide ceramic coatings for Escherichia coli bacteria. AMg6 and D16 aluminium alloys, as well as Zn–Al-based composite coatings, were investigated as solid carriers for microorganisms. A bacterial suspension was prepared and brought into contact with the coating samples under specified conditions; sorption efficiency was calculated from the difference in cell numbers before and after contact, and the condition of the attached cells was evaluated by electron microscopy. The sorption efficiency was 51.0% for the AMg6 coating, 52.2% for the D16 coating and 62.15% for the Zn–Al coating. The highest efficiency was observed for the Zn–Al-based coating. The results indicate that coating composition and surface properties influence the attachment of microorganisms to solid carriers.

Article Details

Section

Soil, Water, Ecological and Sanitary Microbiology

How to Cite

Mamarayimova Marjona Abdusodik kizi, Akhmedova Zahro Rakhmatovna, & Abdullayeva Yulduz Alisher kizi. (2026). Study of the ability of aluminium oxide ceramic coatings to sorb Escherichia coli bacteria. Partner Conferences of the International Scientific Journal Research Focus, 1(8), 298-301. https://doi.org/10.66073/ReFocus-Conf/3010085

References

Feng G., Cheng Y., Wang S.-Y., Hsu L.C., Feliz Y., Borca-Tasciuc D.A., Worobo R.W., Moraru C.I. Alumina surfaces with nanoscale topography reduce attachment and biofilm formation by Escherichia coli and Listeria spp. // Biofouling. — 2014. — Vol. 30, No. 10. — P. 1253–1268. DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2014.976561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2014.976561

Bos R., van der Mei H.C., Busscher H.J. Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions — its mechanisms and methods for study // FEMS Microbiology Reviews. — 1999. — Vol. 23, No. 2. — P. 179–230. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-6445(99)00004-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-6445(99)00004-2

Van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Norde W., Zehnder A.J.B. Physical chemical description of bacterial adhesion // Journal of Biomaterials Applications. — 1990. — Vol. 5, No. 2. — P. 91–106. DOI: 10.1177/088532829000500202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/088532829000500202

Wang Y., Lee S.M., Dykes G. The physicochemical process of bacterial attachment to abiotic surfaces: challenges for mechanistic studies, predictability and the development of control strategies // Critical Reviews in Microbiology. — 2015. — Vol. 41, No. 4. — P. 452–464. DOI: 10.3109/1040841X.2013.866072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2013.866072

Kreve S., Dos Reis A.C. Effect of surface properties of ceramic materials on bacterial adhesion: a systematic review // Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. — 2022. — Vol. 34, No. 3. — P. 461–472. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12799

Berne C., Ellison C.K., Ducret A., Brun Y.V. Bacterial adhesion at the single-cell level // Nature Reviews Microbiology. — 2018. — Vol. 16, No. 10. — P. 616–627. DOI: 10.1038/s41579-018-0057-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0057-5