A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INTERACTIVE AND TRADITIONAL TEACHING METHODS IN DEVELOPING STUDENTS' CRITICAL THINKING

Article Sidebar

PDF (Russian)
Published: 2026-04-23
DOI: https://doi.org/10.66073/ReFocus-Conf/681
Keywords:
Critical thinking, interactive teaching methods, traditional methods, pedagogical technologies, active learning, peer learning

Main Article Content

Pardaboeva Dilfuza Rustamovna
NamGPI, senior lecturer

Abstract

V state rassmatrivaetsya aktualnaya
methodical problem – comparative analysis interactive i
traditsionnykh methodov obucheniya, vyyavlenie ix sushchnostnyx
razchiy i opredelenie ix roli v formirovanii kriticheskogo
myshleniya studentov. Osoboe vnimanie udelyaetsya tekhnologii
razvitiya kriticheskogo myshleniya cherez chtene i pismo kak
effektivnomu instrumentu aktivizatsii poznavatelnoy
deyatelnosti obuchayushchikhsya. Obosnovyvaetsya neokhodimost
integration of interactive methods and educational processes.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): “INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION” Republican Scientific and Practical Conference

Section

Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Pardaboeva Dilfuza Rustamovna. (2026). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INTERACTIVE AND TRADITIONAL TEACHING METHODS IN DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING. Partner Conferences of the International Scientific Journal Research Focus, 1(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.66073/ReFocus-Conf/681

References

1.Ахмедова Л.Т., Лагай Е.А. Современные технологии преподавания русского языка и литературы.- Ташкент.: Fan va teхnologiya, 2016. - 296 с.

2. Ватютнев М.Н. Русский язык-1: Русско-французский помощник- переводчик: Учеб. комплекс для зарубеж. шк. - Москва: Русский язык, 1988. - 234 с.

3. Магдиева С.С. Методика и технологии обучения литературе. Ташкент: ТДПУ, 2018. - 246 с.

4. Полат Е.С.Новые педагогические и информационные технологии в системе образования.- Москва: Академия, 2010

5. Халперн Д. Психология критического мышления.- СанктПетербург: Питер, 2015.

6. Вербицкий А.А. Контекстное обучение в высшей школе.- Москва: Юрайт, 2017.

7. Пардабоева Д.Р. Методы обучения на уроках русского языка // Science and Education. – 2023. - T. З. - № 11. -С. 957.

8. Dehqanova, G. A., & Polvanova, M. F. (2022). National-cultural specificity of phraseological units in english and uzbek languages. research and education, 1(4).

9.Собирова М. Enhancing the mechanisms and factors of improving the literacy of upper school students based on an innovative. https://journal.silkroadscience.com/index.php/EJHEAA/article/view/810. European journal of higher education and academic advancement. VOL.1NO.8(2024)

10. Sobirova, M (2024). Development of oral speech competence of students. International journal of artificial intelligence, 4(03), 596-600. http://www.academicpublishers.org/ International journal of artificial intelligence (ISSN: 2692-5206) Volume 04, Issue 03, Published Date: - 04-

11.Собирова М. Аlisher Navoiy qarashlari – milliy g‘oyamiz International Journal of Economy and Innovation | Volume 42 | Gospodarka i Innowacje https://www.gospodarkainnowacje.pl/index.php/issue_view_32/article/vi ew/2129 2023