THE ROLE OF CALL ACTIVITIES IN TEACHING ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2026-04-23
DOI: https://doi.org/10.66073/ReFocus-Conf/682
Keywords:
CALL activities, English language teaching, Kahoot, vocabulary acquisition, Grammarly, interactive learning, digital platforms, Duolingo, student engagement, virtual classroom, language learning strategies, educational technology

Main Article Content

Raximjonova Muxlisa
Teacher, (Namangan State Pedagogical Institute)

Abstract

This article explores the integration of call activities in
English language teaching, specifically through the use of digital
platforms like Kahoot to enhance vocabulary acquisition. Focusing on a
group of participants engaged in shopping-related vocabulary tasks, the
study demonstrates how interactive learning can foster student
engagement and retention. By implementing Kahoot quizzes, learners
are not only exposed to essential shopping terminology but also
encouraged to participate actively in the learning process. This article
presents detailed strategies for using call activities effectively in virtual
classrooms, highlighting the benefits of gamification in language
learning and providing practical insights for educators looking to enrich
their teaching methodologies.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): “INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION” Republican Scientific and Practical Conference

Section

Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Raximjonova Muxlisa. (2026). THE ROLE OF CALL ACTIVITIES IN TEACHING ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE. Partner Conferences of the International Scientific Journal Research Focus, 1(3), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.66073/ReFocus-Conf/682

References

1. Hanson-Smith, E. (2018). CALL (computer-assisted language learning) materials development.

2. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–7). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0401

3. Kiddle, T. (2013). Developing digital language learning materials. In B. Tomlinson (Ed.),

4. Developing materials for language teaching (pp. 189–206). Bloomsbury Publishing.

5. Krashen, S. D., (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.

6. https://englishonline.britishcouncil.org/free-english-leveltest-cefr https://kahoot.com/

7. Dehkhonova, G. A. (2024). THE CLASSIFICATION OF LEXICAL UNITS WITH FINANCIAL POSITION ACCORDING TO SCIENTISTS VIEW. Academic research in educational sciences, 5(CSPU Conference 1), 542-549.

8. Sobirova, M (2024). Development of oral speech competence of students. International journal of artificial intelligence, 4(03), 596-600. http://www.academicpublishers.org/ International journal of artificial intelligence (ISSN: 2692-5206) Volume 04, Issue 03, Published Date: - 04-

9. Собирова М. Аlisher Navoiy qarashlari – milliy g‘oyamiz poydevori. International Journal of

10. Economy and Innovation | Volume 42 | Gospodarka i https://www.gospodarkainnowacje.pl/index.php/issue_view_32/article/vi ew/2129 2023 LWAB

11. Dehqanova, G. A., & Polvanova, M. F. (2022). Nationalcultural specificity of phraseological units in english and uzbek languages. research and education, 1(4).