COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MORPHOLOGY AND ALLOMORPHOLOGY IN ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper examines a comparative
analysis of morphology and allomorphs in English and Russian.
The study aims to identify similarities and differences in the
morphological structure of the two languages, as well as to analyze
the functioning of allomorphs in word formation and morphological
derivation. Particular attention is paid to the expression
of grammatical categories such as number, case, tense, and aspect, as well as the different forms of morphemes depending on the phonetic and
grammatical environment. The results of the study provide a deeper understanding of the typological features of the English and Russian
languages and their morphological systems.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. Beard Robert. Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology: A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation, 1995 — Pp. 2-3.
2. Marifatkhon Boltabayeva. (). The Clash Of Religious and Secular Views In Graham Greene’s Works. Emergent: Journal of Educational Discoveries and Lifelong Learning (EJEDL), 2025(3), 8. https://doi.org/10.47134/emergent.v4i1.64
3. Haspelmath Martin Understanding Morphology. Andrea D. Sims (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Education 2010. p. 14.
4. LITERARY AND AESTHETIC INTERPRETATION OF THE IMAGE OF A TEENAGER IN ENGLISH LITERATURE. EduVision: Journal of Innovations in Pedagogy and Educational Advancements, 2025, 974-980. https://brightmindpublishing.com/index.php/ev/article/view/1202
5. Kemmer, Suzanne. “Structure”. Words in English. Archived from the original on 31 August 2004. Retrieved 10 April 2014.
6. Odilboyeva, U. Z. Q. O‘ZBEK VA INGLIZ TILLARIDA TERMINLAR HOSIL BO‘LISHINING QIYOSIY TAHLILI. Mahalliy va xalqaro konferensiyalar platformasi, 2026 (1), 32-36.
7. De Kuthy, Kordula “Morphology” (PDF). Linguistics 201: Introduction to Language in the Humanities. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-03-20. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
8. Dehqanova, G. A., & Polvanova, M. F. (2022). National-cultural specificity of phraseological units in english and uzbek languages. research and education, 1(4).
9. Gerner Matthias; Ling, Zhang. “Zero morphemes in paradigms” Studies in Language. International Journal Sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language” Archived from the original on 2020-09-19. Retrieved 2020-09-15. Dahl Eystein Dahl; Fábregas, Antonio “Zero Morphemes” from the original on 3 November 2019. Retrieved 3 November 2019.
10.Nakagawa Tetsuji, “Chinese and Japanese word segmentation using word-level and character-level information” Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics – COLING ’04. Geneva, Switzerland: Association for Computational Linguistics. 2004. pp. 466.
11. Matthew Baerman The Morpheme. 16 June 2022. Retrieved 30 September 2019.
12. Nosirova S. Y., & Umarjonova, S. THE ROLE OF COMICS IN TEACHING ENGLISH TO YOUNG LEARNERS. In International Conference Platform 2025, December, pp. 171-172).
13.Shaxlo M. M. (2025). DESIGNING AN ENGLISH FOR BUSINESS PURPOSES (EBP) COURSE: A TASK-BASED AND PROBLEM-BASED APPROACH FOR PRE-INTERMEDIATE BUSINESS PROFESSIONALS. PROSPECTS OF TEACHING ENGLISH FOR PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES IN NON– PHILOLOGICAL HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS, 518-525.
14. Baerman Matthew Matthew Baerman, The Morpheme,
Stephen R. Anderson, (2015), p. 3.
15. Plag Ingo, The structure of words: morphology, Sabine ArndtLappe, Maria Braun, and Mareile Schramm, Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter, Inc. 2015, pp. 71–112.