FOSTERING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE CLASSES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article investigates the critical challenges and
opportunities associated with developing critical thinking skills within
English language learning environments. In the framework of
contemporary educational paradigms, critical thinking represents not
only a cornerstone of academic achievement but also an indispensable
life competency. The study systematically examines a range of
pedagogical approaches, including Socratic dialogue, Problem-Based
Learning (PBL), debate methodologies, and cooperative learning
strategies. Empirical findings indicate that targeted pedagogical
intervention significantly enhances students' capacity for critical
analysis, evaluative reasoning, and creative synthesis. The article
further explores the transformative role of digital technologies and online
platforms in augmenting critical thinking development. The conclusion
asserts that English language instruction offers uniquely rich
opportunities for cultivating critical thinking skills, and that educators
are well-positioned to leverage these opportunities through intentional,
reflective practice.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Akerman, R., & Neale, I. (2011). Debating the evidence: An international review of current situation and perceptions. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's educational objectives. Longman.
Atkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 71–94.
Avezova, D., Sobirova, F., Sotiboldiyev, A., Muminjonova, S.,
Tursunboyeva, M., Sobirova, R., ... & Kibriyev, B. (2026). Exploring Genetic and Epigenetic Influences on Language Acquisition and Cognitive Development. Genetics and Molecular Research, 25(1).
Benesch, S. (1999). Thinking critically, thinking dialogically. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 573–580.Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. David
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D.C. Heath.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). California Academic Press. S. M. (2025, December). FLIPPED CLASSROOM AS A TOOL FOR PROMOTING SELF-REGULATED LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION. In International Conference Platform (No. 6, pp. 187-190).
Shaxlo, M. M. (2025). DESIGNING AN ENGLISH FOR BUSINESS PURPOSES (EBP) COURSE: A TASK-BASED AND PROBLEM-BASED APPROACH FOR PRE-INTERMEDIATE BUSINESS PROFESSIONALS. PROSPECTS OF TEACHING ENGLISH FOR PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES IN NON– PHILOLOGICAL HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS, 518-525.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. Muhammadjon o‘g, O. R. A. (2025, December). RAQAMLI TRANSFORMATSIYA SHAROITIDA PEDAGOGIKA YO‘NALISHI TALABALARI KREATIV FIKRLASH KOMPETENSIYASINI SHAKLLANTIRISHNING INNOVATSION METODIKASI. In Partner conferences of the International Scientific Journal Research Focus (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1156-1159).