ONLINE AND OFFLINE LANGUAGE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2026-04-23
DOI: https://doi.org/10.66073/ReFocus-Conf/898
Keywords:
online learning, offline learning, feedback, language skills, interaction, online education, accessibility, blended learning

Main Article Content

Abdumalikova Ma'sudajon Abdunabi qizi
1st year Master's student in NamSPI

Abstract

This study examines the differences between online and
offline language learning, focusing on their effectiveness in developing
learners’ language skills. With the rapid growth of digital technologies,
online learning has become increasingly popular, while traditional faceto-face instruction remains widely used. This paper uses a qualitative
literature review to compare the advantages, limitations, and
pedagogical implications of both modes. The findings suggest that while
online learning offers flexibility and accessibility, offline learning
provides stronger interaction and immediate feedback. The study
concludes that a blended approach is the most effective strategy for
modern language education.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): “INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION” Republican Scientific and Practical Conference

Section

Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Abdumalikova Ma'sudajon Abdunabi qizi. (2026). ONLINE AND OFFLINE LANGUAGE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. Partner Conferences of the International Scientific Journal Research Focus, 1(1), 906-910. https://doi.org/10.66073/ReFocus-Conf/898

References

1. Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach English. Pearson.

2. Farmonov, A., Dadabaev, Z., Qosimova, G., Juramurodov, D.,

Nishonova, D., Boboyev, S., & Tursunov, Q. (2026). Genome-Wide Insights into The Role of Genetic Variability in Linguistic and Cognitive Functions. Genetics and Molecular Research, 25(1).

3. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2022). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

4. Blake, R. (2013). Brave New Digital Classroom. Georgetown University Press.

5. Zakirovich, D. Z. (2025). INTEGRATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING TO STUDENTS OF CHEMISTRY FACULTY. PROSPECTS OF TEACHING ENGLISH FOR PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES IN NON–PHILOLOGICAL HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS, 383-389.Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2012). How to Teach English with Technology. Pearson.

6. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education. Jossey-Bass.