AI ASSISTANTS AS DIALOGUE PRACTICE PARTNERS: EXPERIENCE OF APPLICATION IN THE EFL CLASSROOM
Main Article Content
Abstract
The growing availability of large language model
(LLM)-based conversational tools – most notably ChatGPT and
specialised derivatives – has introduced a genuinely transformative
resource into English as a Foreign Language (EFL) pedagogy. This
article offers a theoretically grounded and empirically informed synthesis
of current knowledge concerning the use of AI assistants as dialogue
practice partners in EFL settings. Drawing on peer-reviewed research
published primarily between 2022 and 2025, the paper examines three
dimensions of AI-assisted dialogue practice: its theoretical foundations
in sociocultural learning theory and communicative language teaching;
its documented effects on foreign language speaking anxiety, willingness
to communicate, oral fluency, and learner autonomy; and the critical
pedagogical limitations that must be addressed for responsible
integration. The article argues that AI dialogue partners, deployed
purposefully within a teacher-guided framework, offer meaningful
supplementary communicative practice – particularly in contexts, such
as Uzbekistan and broader Central Asia, where learners have
structurally limited access to authentic English interaction. The paper
concludes with evidence-based recommendations for integrating AI
dialogue tools into EFL speaking instruction without displacing the
irreducibly human dimensions of communicative language development.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. Fathi, J., Derakhshan, A., & Torabi, M. (2024). AI-supported speaking activities and EFL learners' WTC and speaking skills. System, 121, 103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103254
2. Functional-Stylistic Features of Uzbek Legal Discourse [Data set]. (2024). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10511672
3. Jeon, J., Lee, S., & Choe, H. (2023). AI chatbots as practice partners for EFL conversation skills. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1–20.
4. MacIntyre, P. D., Dörnyei, Z., Clément, R., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing WTC in a L2: A situational model. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 4781.1998.tb05543.x
5. Nizomova, T. J. (2025). Interactivity and inter-institutional communication in legal discourse. Zamonaviy tilshunoslik istiqbollari, 1(6), 161–165. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15590339